RUB | Fakultät für Philosophie und Erziehungswissenschaft | Institut für Philosophie II
    Research group Home | AnneMarie annemarietiny.jpg | Christian tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg | Dunja tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg | Jesse tiny_jesse.heyninck.jpg | Mathieu tiny_mathieu.beirlaen.jpg | Pere pere.jpg | FAQ for members

Publications of Dunja Šešelja

Table of Contents

Summary: 18 (published or accepted for publication) articles in peer-reviewed journals or peer-reviewed edited volumes, of which 10 are first authorships, six senior authorships and 17 without any of my PhD supervisors. The articles where I am a senior author are marked with † (here the order of authors is alphabetical).

Forthcoming

tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  1. Šešelja D.
    Exploring Scientific Inquiry via Agent-Based Modeling,
    currently under review for Perspectives on Science (draft available at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15120/1/Exploratory_ABMs.pdf)

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg annemarietiny.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  2. † Edited volume (together with AnneMarie Borg and Christian Straßer):
    "Formal Models of Scientific Inquiry",
    Journal for General Philosophy of Science.

Articles in peer-reviewed journals or peer-reviewed edited volumes

tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  1. Šešelja D. (2019)
    Some Lessons from Simulations of Scientific Disagreements,
    Synthese (accepted for publication)

    annemarietiny.jpg danielftiny.png tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  2. † Borg A., Frey D., Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2019)
    Theory-Choice, Transient Diversity and the Efficiency of Scientific Inquiry,
    European Journal of Philosophy of Science, http://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-019-0249-5

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg danielftiny.png

  3. † Frey D. and Šešelja D. (2018)
    Robustness and Idealizations in Agent-Based Models of Scientific Interaction,
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy039.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg danielftiny.png

  4. † Frey D. and Šešelja D. (2018)
    What is the Epistemic Function of Highly Idealized Agent-Based Models of Scientific Inquiry?,
    Philosophy of the Social Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393118767085.

    annemarietiny.jpg danielftiny.png tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  5. † Borg, A., Frey D., Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2018)
    Epistemic effects of scientific interaction: approaching the question with an argumentative agent-based model,
    Historical Social Research 43.1, pp. 285–309.

    annemarietiny.jpg danielftiny.png tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  6. † Borg A., Frey D., Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2017)
    Examining Network Effects in an Argumentative Agent-Based Model of Scientific Inquiry
    in Baltag A., Seligman J., Yamada T. (eds) "Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2017", Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10455. Springer, pp. 391-406.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg danielftiny.png tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg annemarietiny.jpg

  7. † Borg A., Frey D., Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2017)
    An Argumentative Agent-Based Model of Scientific Inquiry,
    in Benferhat S., Tabia K., Ali M. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence: From Theory to Practice. IEA/AIE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10350. Springer, pp. 507-510.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  8. Šešelja D. (2017)
    Scientific Pluralism and Inconsistency Toleration,
    Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 32, pp. 1-29 (invited paper)

tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  1. Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2014)
    Heuristic Reevaluation of the Bacterial Hypothesis of Peptic Ulcer Disease in the 1950s,
    Acta Biotheoretica, 62, pp. 429-454.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  2. Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2014)
    Concerning Peter Vickers’ Recent Treatment of ‘Paraconsistencitis’: Review article of Peter Vickers, Understanding Inconsistent Science.
    Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. xii + 273 pp., International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28(3), pp. 325-340 (invited review article).

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  3. Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2014)
    Epistemic Justification in the Context of Pursuit: A Coherentist Approach,
    Synthese, 191, pp. 3111-3141.

    tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg jwtiny.jpg

  4. Straßer C., Šešelja D. and Wieland J. W. (2014)
    Withstanding Tensions: Scientific Disagreement and Epistemic Tolerance
    in: Ippoliti E. (ed.), Heuristic Reasoning, Springer Series Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, pp. 113-146 (invited paper).

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  5. Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2013)
    Kuhn and the Question of Pursuit Worthiness,
    Topoi, 32, pp. 9-19.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  6. Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2013)
    Abstract Argumentation and Explanation Applied to Scientific Debates,
    Synthese, 190, pp. 2195–2217.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg eriktiny.jpg

  7. Šešelja D. and Weber E. (2012)
    Rationality and Irrationality in the History of Continental Drift: Was the Hypothesis of Continental Drift Worthy of Pursuit?,
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science - Part A, 43, pp. 147-159.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg lastiny.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  8. Šešelja D., Kosolosky L. and Straßer C. (2012)
    Rationality of Scientific Reasoning in the Context of Pursuit: Drawing appropriate distinctions,
    Philosophica, 85, pp. 51-82.

    tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  9. Straßer C. and Šešelja D. (2010)
    Towards the Proof-Theoretic Unification of Dung's Argumentation Framework: An Adaptive Logic Approach,
    Journal of Logic and Computation, 21, pp. 133-156.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg tiny_christian.stra_er.jpg

  10. Šešelja D. and Straßer C. (2009)
    Kuhn and Coherentist Epistemology: in reply to J. M. Kuukkanen,
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science – Part A, 40, pp. 322-327.

Other publications

tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg eriktiny.jpg

  • Weber E. and Šešelja D. (2010)
    How to Identify Scientific Revolutions?,
    in: Torres J. M. (ed.), On Kuhn's Philosophy and its Legacy, CFCUL, Lisbon, pp. 251-282.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  • Šešelja D. (2006)
    Mesto i uloga filozofije u Vitgenštajnovim filozofskim istraživanjima: uvodno razmatranje,
    Godišnjak Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 31, pp. 515-526.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  • Šešelja D. (2004)
    Prikaz: Propedeutika logike (M. Aćimović, Elementi logike, 2004),
    Arhe, I/2, pp. 251-257.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  • Šešelja D. (2004)
    Teorija istine i naucni realizam u Poperovoj filozofiji nauke,
    Arhe, II/3, pp. 83-99.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  • Šešelja D. (2004)
    Poperov falsifikacionizam i kritika indukcije,
    Pedagoška stvarnost: Časopis za školska i kulturno-prosvetna pitanja, L/5-6, pp. 394-408.

    tiny_dunja._e_elja.jpg

  • Šešelja D. (2003)
    Aktuelnost Popera i metodologija analize društveno-političkih diskursa (Nacrt za metodu kritičke analize društveno-političkih diskursa),
    Revija za sociologiju, 34, pp. 43-53.

Author: Dunja Seselja

Created: 2019-02-19 Tue 13:05

Validate